WHAT IS NEXT FOR LOCAL HERO?

A.J. Hoffman: The Case against hitching your wagon to Keenum longterm

What does the future hold for Case Keenum? Twincities.com

Case Keenum has done something I never thought he would do. He had (nearly) a full season of excellent quarterback play in the NFL. In 15 games (14 starts) this year he was 11-3 with 3,547 yards, 22 touchdowns and only 7 interceptions. He finished with a completion percentage of 67.6, second only to Drew Brees in the NFL this year. He was seventh in the league in passer rating (98.3) and 2nd in QBR (71.3). 

While all that is impressive, it hasn’t changed my mind about Keenum’s long term future. Case is part of a perfect storm in Minnesota. The Vikings have built their team the right way. They are excellent on the offensive line. They have arguably the best defense in the league. They found an excellent play-caller in Pat Shurmer. Not to say that Keenum hasn’t played a major role in their success this year. He absolutely has. The question is whether or not his role in their success is sustainable, and for how long?

The Vikings will have a tough decision to make at the end of this season at the quarterback position. All three quarterbacks on their roster are free agents, and all three can make a case for being the Vikings’ signal caller going forward. 

The Vikings traded up to take Teddy Bridgewater with the last pick in the 1st round of the 2014 draft. Up until his horrific offseason knee injury, he looked poised to be the quarterback of the future. The Vikes are invested in him, and believed in him, even though you could arguably contribute the Vikings' success to his surrounding cast as much as you can with Keenum. He is 26 years old and has a lot of football ahead of him. 

Sam Bradford, a former No. 1 overall pick, was brought in initially to take over after the Bridgewater injury. The Vikings believed the rest of their team was good enough to win, so they gave up a 1st round pick and a 4th round pick to bring him over from Philadelphia. Bradford played very well in 2016, throwing for a career-high 3,877 yards and a 20-5 touchdown-interception rate. Unfortunately, the Vikings didn’t play well around him (they didn’t have a 100-yard rusher all season) and after a 5-0 start finished at a disappointing 8-8. He opened the 2017 season as the starter, and in his opening day start looked brilliant against the Saints, posting a 346 yard, three touchdown performance that gave him a better passer rating than any Keenum start of the season. His balky right knee was an issue again, though, and he missed the next three weeks. Bradford came back to start the week 5 Chicago game, but was ineffective and pulled from the game. He had knee surgery three weeks later. We know former 1st round picks almost always get another chance, but the Vikings may have too much concern about Bradford’s knee to want to commit to a long-term, big money deal with him. 

Keenum has the most obvious recent success. He has taken this team further in the playoffs than anyone since Brett Favre lost the NFC Championship Game after the 2009 season. He also has the least pedigree, and possibly the perceived lowest ceiling of the bunch. An undrafted free agent who seemed destined to be a career backup, he had not taken advantage of his previous opportunities to start. He went 0-8 as a starter in 2013 with the Texans. He went 2-0 in spot starts in 2014, but was largely ineffective. He moved on to Saint Louis in 2015 and went 3-2 for a team that relied heavily on stud rookie running back Todd Gurley. He went into 2016 as the starter for the Rams, freshly moved to Los Angeles, and went 4-5 before giving way to No. 1 overall pick Jared Goff. The work he did with the Texans and Rams wasn’t bad work, it just wasn’t starting quarterback work. The Vikings liked the idea of Keenum coming in to back up Bradford while Bridgewater continued his rehab, and signed him to a 1-year, $2 million deal. 

The rest is history. In fact, the story of Keenum’s 2017 season is still being told, and the ending could have a significant impact on what the Vikings do this offseason. It would be very difficult to send a Super Bowl winning quarterback away and go back to pinning your hopes to an injury-prone veteran or a once highly thought of prospect coming off what the team once thought was a career-ending injury. The Vikings also don’t want to be put in a situation where they have to pay Keenum premium money after a Super Bowl win, knowing that he may not be a premium player. 

The Baltimore Ravens are a cautionary tale after giving Joe Flacco a 6-year, $120-plus million contract with $52 million guaranteed. Flacco had just won them a Super Bowl after a fantastic playoff run, but up to that point Flacco had been a good, not great quarterback. Since signing that deal in 2013, the Ravens have gone 40-40, with just one playoff appearance. For the most part during that stretch, Flacco has continued to be a good, not great quarterback. 

Case Keenum has earned the right to be a starter in the NFL. He is one of the 32 best quarterbacks in the league. I just wouldn’t want to be the GM that bets my career on giving him a long-term contract. The Vikings could use the transition tag or the franchise tag on Keenum. The franchise tag would likely be worth $23.5 million and the transition tag would be worth about $21.5 million. Keenum, whose career earnings through five seasons are under $7 million, would likely jump at the opportunity to make that kind of money on a one-year deal. He would then have a chance to prove that 2017 was not a fluke and earn a long-term deal next offseason. If this is the case, the Vikings would also probably attempt to sign Bridgewater to a team-friendly deal to keep him on as insurance. However, the risk of another team coming in and paying him on his upside and outbidding the Vikings is real. 

If Keenum doesn’t win the Super Bowl, I could see the Vikings trying to sign Bridgewater to a long-term deal and offering Keenum a contract that would make him one of the highest paid backups in the league. Of course, there could be another team out there that is willing to take a chance and offer him big money to be their franchise quarterback. If I were Vikings GM Rick Spielman, I would let Keenum walk away if that were to happen. Knowing that offensive coordinator Pat Shurmur is likely to land a head coaching job at the end of the season, let someone else inherit the risk of paying a career journeyman franchise quarterback money based on a career year where everything fell into place. 

Take a look at these two quarterbacks:

QB A- 38 starts, 20-18 W/L, 8,771 passing yards, 46 touchdowns, 27 interceptions, 86 rating

QB B- 39 starts, 22-17 W/L, 9.752 passing yards, 61 touchdowns, 29 interceptions, 87.4 rating

QB A is Keenum. QB B is his NFC Championship Game counterpart, Nick Foles. Foles had a magical 10-game stretch in 2013 in relief of Michael Vick, going 8-2 with a 27-2 TD/INT rate. At the time, it was thought that he may be the quarterback of the future. He went 6-2 in 8 games for Philly the next season, but his ratios were not good, and the Eagles traded him to the Rams (ironically for Sam Bradford). His success didn’t carry over, and he and Keenum went back and forth between starter and backup over his time with the Rams. He eventually went back to Philadelphia to back up Carson Wentz, who went down late in the regular season, leaving Foles in position to try to guide his team to a Super Bowl.

Teams that have franchise quarterbacks tend to hold onto them. Teams that know they don’t tend to be in a desperate panic mode until they find one. Whatever Keenum does in the NFC Championship game, and potentially the Super Bowl, he has exceeded any expectations I ever had for him. He is a legitimate starting quarterback in the NFL. I just wouldn’t want him to be the starter for my team. 

Most Popular

SportsMap Emails
Are Awesome

Listen Live

A WEEKLY REVIEW OF CRENNEL'S COACHING

Now my job: Texans feast on Lions

Photo by Getty Images.

Thanksgiving is full of tradition. There's the typical family gathering, large meal, and of course, football. Sometimes, new traditions are added and old ones are retired. I think the Texans did both in their impressive 41-25 win over the Lions in Detroit. Old traditions were carried on (Lions losing on Thanksgiving), some were put to rest (Texans not being able to get turnovers), and new ones were started (multiple passing touchdowns by Deshaun Watson in six straight games).

The fact that this defense got three turnovers in the game was unbelievable! They got all three in the first quarter within the span of eight plays. JJ Watt's pick-six was insane. He went for a batted ball, ended up catching it, and ran it in. They forced Jonathan Williams to fumble on the Lions' very next play from scrimmage and recovered it. On the Lions' next possession, the Texans recovered yet another fumble after the challenge was reversed. Great call by the coaching staff to challenge and win. The defense looked good. Tyrell Adams stood out because he was in on those two fumbles, made 17 total tackles with 14 of them being solo tackles. They also brought pressure that seemed to make Matthew Stafford very inaccurate and resulted in four sacks. I give defensive coordinator Anthony Weaver credit for knowing he needs to blitz to get pressure, but the run defense has to improve.

The offense kept the tempo up in this game as well. The spread and hurry-up were used to keep the Lions already staggered defense off balance. Knowing the Lions were without a couple defensive backs, I thought it would be the perfect marriage of their defense and the Texans' offense. A buddy asked before the game about the line (Texans -3.5) and the over/under (52.5). I told him bet the Texans and the over because neither team can play defense and both have good quarterbacks. Offensive coordinator Tim Kelly put together another good game plan and Watson executed it flawlessly. One route combo I saw later on in the game I particularly enjoyed. Two receivers were tight to the left side. Cooks ran a hook/curl and settled in the middle of the zone while Fuller ran a vertical route. Duke Johnson ran a swing route to that same side. It left Cooks wide open as the attention went to Johnson in the flat, Fuller deep, and the action to the other play side. Route combos are important because it gives the quarterback different reads as he goes through his progressions and lets him pick apart the defense based on what he sees. Combine that with Watson's play and the way Kelly has changed his play calling now that he's liberated from he who shall not be named, we're seeing a beautiful thing.

As good as things were, there's still room for improvement. The defense gives up way too many easy yards, both run and pass. They can't get pressure bringing only four and will often give up big plays if the blitz is picked up. Plus the run defense is still an issue as evidenced by the Lions' first possession of the second half. The Lions ran the ball 10 plays straight for a total of 58 yards on that drive. Utterly ridiculous! Watson was good (17/25 318 yards and four touchdowns), but he missed two more touchdowns with passes slightly off, and continues to hold onto the ball too long at times. The difference between these two issues I've presented here is the fact that Watson has so played well, his "issues" are minor and very correctable, while the defense is terrible and there's no easy fix in sight. But let Romeo Crennel and Anthony Weaver tell it, they're getting the most out of these guys and they're playing disciplined.

The thought that this team may actually creep into the playoff picture may take shape better after next week if they can beat the Colts. I doubt it, but it is getting interesting. Let's see what else happens around them because they need help getting there.

SportsMap Emails
Are Awesome