ESPN's Jeff Passan caused quite the frenzy on Friday when he posted on X about the Dodgers' “pursuit of winning” being unmatched.

He also made it clear that other organizations could follow the Dodgers' blueprint and defer money, but they choose not to, for a variety of reasons.

Passan received some pushback, with many people pointing to the TV money the Dodgers receive, that just isn't a reality in other markets. But as Passan points out in the post below, deferring money isn't exclusive to the Dodgers.

Passan's stance on free agency got us thinking about how the Astros handle their contracts, and stick to their policy of avoiding long-term deals.

If ever there was a player to make an exception for, it would have been Kyle Tucker. But it also takes two to tango. Tucker would have to have been willing to defer some of his money. Plus, there is some downside when teams defer cash. It lowers the perceived value of the team, and some clubs have been forced to take floater loans just to make payroll.

Shots fired!

Super agent Scott Boras took a swipe at the Astros after they dropped out of the running for Alex Bregman.

“Over time, teams learn if you’re running from leadership and talent, you’re running from the ultimate goal,” said Boras. It's funny, we don't remember Boras having that same opinion of the 'Stros when his client Jose Altuve signed a long-term deal with the club just last year. He is clearly upset about losing leverage in the Bregman negotiations, with Houston no longer in the mix.

Don't miss the video above as we address the comments from Passan and Boras, and examine if Crane's philosophy on mega contracts needs to evolve for the Astros to compete at the highest levels again.

Plus, will Corbin Burnes' massive deal with the Diamondbacks change the Astros' approach with Framber Valdez?