LOOKING BACK

What has changed since the last time we heard the words “Houston wins the Pennant?”

What has changed since the last time we heard the words “Houston wins the Pennant?”
Jeff Bagwell was near the end when the Astros played in the World Series in 2005. Photo by Otto Greule Jr/Stringer/Getty Images

After the Chicago Cubs won the World Series last year, I read an article about the country’s most depressing sports cities. This was obviously an exercise in futility because every city that has a long drought from winning titles feels uniquely depressed in their own way. The last “Big Three” Houston sports team to win a championship were the Rockets in 1993-94 and 1994-95. If the Astros win the World Series, I imagine the “then and now” articles will be even more drastic. The last team to even go to a championship game were the Astros in 2005 and they were swept by the Chicago White Sox. Houston and the entire country as a whole has completely changed since 2005. I was just a high school senior, working as a server (in 2005 they called us waitresses) at a wing restaurant where I experienced the euphoric highs of watching my boys win the pennant and the lowly lows of watching that same team get beaten four straight times. It almost feels like the 2005 World Series never happened. We celebrated FINALLY beating the St. Louis Cardinals, only to have the rug pulled out from underneath us in a week.

How much has Houston changed in the 12 years that have passed since the Astros last won the pennant? Well, for one – the Astros are now an American League team, the only team to win a pennant in both the American and National League. Where there used to be a hill in the outfield, there is a now a Torchy’s Tacos, and both Saint Arnold and Karbach have a presence at the ball park. The make-up of this team is also very different. Young players acquired through the draft supplemented by veterans give the team an underdog feel, but also a locker room with experience in the postseason.

But outside of the Astros and their home field, how much has changed? The answer? Everything.

Let’s start with downtown Houston. In 2005, downtown was a complete disaster. Houstonians drove into downtown to go to work, then immediately left to head home. There was no bar scene, the light rail system was used by no one except people looking to migrate from one part of downtown to the other, or homeless people trying to get out of the elements. There were barely any restaurants downtown and any places that did exist closed at 5 pm. It was a barren wasteland of office buildings and space begging to be utilized. Flash forward to now and you’ll see a completely revitalized downtown. Hotels that never existed before, a revitalized and expanded rail system, and a transformed bar scene on Main that attracts patrons from neighborhoods that 12 years ago were just as downtrodden and hopeless as the city center itself.  

My current neighborhood, Montrose, was one of those neighborhoods. In 2005 it was generally still a haven for the art crowd, and LGBTQ folks hoping to find a safe space where they wouldn’t be ostracized. As a weird teenager in 2005, I longed to escape the suburbs and move to Montrose. Now, Montrose is where yuppies looking for an artsy neighborhoods tear down bungalows and build giant apartment complexes and three story townhomes. Gay bars have been replaced by kitschy restaurants and the annual Pride Parade has moved from the neighborhood to downtown Houston for no other reason than the complaints of people who’ve never experienced the parade in the first place.

What about the world as a whole? What changes have we seen since 2005? Currently on it’s 8th iteration, the phone that has completely changed the world and how we experience it wouldn’t even be released for another two years. In 2005, the phone to have was the Motorola Razr – a slender flip phone that fit perfectly in your back pocket. You were still using T9 to text your friends and plans that included “data” weren’t even necessary. No one thought about accessing the internet on your cell phone. You used it for calls, texts if you were good enough and taking grainy low resolution pictures.

Because the iPhone hadn’t been invented yet, you had to access Facebook from your actual computer. Twitter didn’t exist. The idea of taking a photo that lasted for only 10 seconds was a thought would only occur to Brett Favre or Anthony Wiener – and in 2005, both of them still kept their pants on. If you went out for a delicious dinner, there was no Instagram to share your meal with. Apps didn’t exist, so highlights were consumed via SportsCenter or on your computer. You couldn’t watch game highlights on your phone seconds after they happened. For me, one of the most jarring changes of the past twelve years comes in our exposure to athlete’s real time thoughts on social media. In 2005, if a player felt a certain way about social issues, or team issues, or even other players in the league we didn’t know that unless they spoke with someone in sports media. Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram have given us access to athletes in a unique way. We are seeing them as people and not just the carefully crafted robots that the media have access to. Because of this, instead of beat reporters or sideline reporters having the best information about a team, it’s many times their own words on social media that people dissect. Generally, we’re not interested in a canned locker room response to a specific question, but rather a set of emoji eyeballs on Twitter, or a random Instagram like from an athlete.

The No. 1 song in October 2005? Gold Digger by Kanye West. Batman Begins was released. George W. Bush was still president.

Our city has changed drastically in the past 12 years. But more important still, our world purview and access to the athletes we’ve seen before only as entertainment has changed the most. This year for the World Series I’ll be trading in the Wings N More from 2005 for a sports bar, favoriting tweets from the Astros social media, and keeping up with my internet friends online. Along with all of the changes in Houston and the world, let’s hope the boys have a different outcome on the field as well.

Most Popular

SportsMap Emails
Are Awesome

Listen Live

ESPN Houston 97.5 FM
The Thunder beat the Rockets, 111-96. Photo by Alex Slitz/Getty Images.

It was midway through the third quarter of the Oklahoma City-Houston NBA Cup semifinal matchup on Saturday night. Thunder star Shai Gilgeous-Alexander had just made a short jumper in the lane and, to his delight, a time-out was immediately called.

He needed it.

He retreated to midcourt, crouched down, propped himself up by his fingertips and took deep breath after deep breath. It was that sort of night. And given the way the Rockets and Thunder have defended all season long, such a game was predictable.

In the end, it was Oklahoma City 111, Houston 96 in a game where the teams combined to shoot 41%. The immediate reward for the Thunder: two days off to recover. The bigger reward: a matchup with Milwaukee on Tuesday night for the NBA Cup, with more than $300,000 per player the difference between winning and losing.

“That's what defense does for you,” said Thunder coach Mark Daigneault, whose team has held opponents to 41% shooting or worse a league-best 11 times this season — and is 11-0 in those games. “It keeps you in games.”

The Rockets-Thunder semifinal was basketball, with elements of football, rugby, hockey and probably even some wrestling thrown in. It wasn't unusual. It's how they play: defense-first, tough, gritty, physical.

They are the two top teams in the NBA in terms of field-goal percentage defense — Oklahoma City came in at 42.7%, Houston at 43.4% — and entered the night as two of the top three in scoring defense. Orlando led entering Saturday at 103.7 per game, Oklahoma City was No. 2 at 103.8, Houston No. 3 at 105.9. (The Thunder, by holding Houston to 96, passed the Magic for the top spot on Saturday.)

Houston finished 36.5% from the field, its second-worst showing of the season. When the Rockets shoot 41% or better, they're 17-4. When they don't, they're 0-5.

“Sometimes it comes down to making shots,” Rockets coach Ime Udoka said. “Especially in the first half, we guarded well enough. ... But you put a lot of pressure on your defense when you're not making shots.”

Even though scoring across the NBA is down slightly so far this season, about a point per game behind last season's pace and two points from the pace of the 2022-23 season, it's still a golden age for offense in the league. Consider: Boston scored 51 points in a quarter earlier this season.

Saturday was not like most games. The halftime score: Rockets 42, Thunder 41. Neither team crossed the 50-point mark until Dillon Brooks' 3-pointer for Houston gave the Rockets a 51-45 lead with 8:46 left in the third quarter.

Brooks is generally considered one of the game's tougher defenders. Gilgeous-Alexander is one of the game's best scorers. They're teammates on Canada's national team, and they had some 1-on-1 moments on Saturday.

“It's fun. It makes you better,” Gilgeous-Alexander said. “That's what this league is about, competing against the best in the world and defensively, he is that for sure. And I like to think that of myself offensively. He gives me a chance to really see where I'm at, a good test. I'd say I handled it pretty well.”

Indeed he did. Gilgeous-Alexander finished with 32 points, the fifth instance this season of someone scoring that many against the Rockets. He's done it twice, and the Thunder scored 70 points in the second half to pull away.

“We knew that if we kept getting stops we would give ourselves a chance,” Gilgeous-Alexander said. “And we did so.”

SportsMap Emails
Are Awesome