Welcome back. Let's talk Rockets.

State of the Rockets: If the season returned

Russell Westbrook

For obvious reasons, we haven't done one of these in a while. However, it feels like a good time to check in on not only the state of the Rockets, but the state of the NBA. It's now been a full month since the NBA decided to suspend the 2019-20 season indefinitely after Utah Jazz center Rudy Gobert tested positive for Covid-19. Before this, the league had already barred media from locker rooms and was planning on playing games without fans.

So, where do things stand one month in?

Well, as everyone reading this already knows, more than 90% of the country is under stay-at-home orders of some sort. As of this writing, over half a million Americans have tested positive for coronavirus and nearly twenty thousand people have died. While it's particularly bad in states like New York and Louisiana, every state has been impacted severely by this virus in one way or another.

There is some encouraging data that's come out this week that suggests social distancing efforts have at least slowed the spread of the virus a little bit. However, it's important to note that we're far from out of the woods as many hospitals haven't reached their estimated peaks yet and restrictions on the local and national level have yet to be lifted. The whole point of social distancing is that the end result will hopefully look like we've overreacted when in fact the opposite is true.

As far as the NBA is concerned, commissioner Adam Silver has already ruled out the possibility of any decision being made in the month of April. If that's the case, the idea of the league starting back up again in the next two months seems unlikely. There's also the non-zero chance the league unilaterally makes the decision to end the 2019-20 season without an NBA champion. However, it's a little hard to envision this possibility for several reasons.

The biggest reason is obviously the amount of playoff revenue the NBA would be leaving on the table. Currently, the league office is trying to do everything they can to preserve as much of the current salary cap as they can. There's little doubt that the cab will take a significant hit due to the pandemic and there's a strong possibility that if the NBA does return, regular season games would not. That's revenue from about 18 games (give or take) for every team down the drain on top of what they lost with the China debacle this summer.

Every team in the NBA will have to reshape their offseason plans because of the cap hit. Damage will be done and there's no way around it. The best possible way to limit that damage would be to have a playoffs this year.

For what it's worth, 15 out of 25 randomly selected people around the NBA (media, team personnel, agents, players, etc…) said they were optimistic of the season returning in some way, shape, or form.


So assuming that they're right and that the league does return, what does that mean for the Rockets?

Seeding

More than most title contenders, the Rockets are a team that desperately would like a run-up to the season. Currently, Houston is slated as the sixth seed in the Western Conference and would likely have the toughest path to the NBA Finals from all the realistic title contenders. Only one team has won the championship from the sixth seed in league history - the 1995-96 Houston Rockets.

Having to face every one of their opponents on the road and still be able to hoist the Larry O'Brian trophy in the summer is unlikely. The best case scenario for Houston is they have at least five to ten regular season games to climb a little bit in the standings.

Chemistry

The other reason the Rockets would prefer a run up is that they ended the season finishing 1-4 in their last five games. Houston, being just 18 games into the micro-ball era, would probably want a little more time with this unique style of play before they go through the gauntlet that is the Western Conference.

Now, to be fair, the Rockets finish 12-6 in the micro-ball era on the whole. That's on-pace for 55 wins, which is noticeably better than what they were before micro-ball (50 wins). Robert Covington was a welcome addition to their play style and PJ Tucker has actually played less after the move to center (32.9 minutes per game) versus before the change (35.0 minutes per game). Russell Westbrook is also thriving within his new role.

But after Houston's rough patch before the hiatus, they may want to wipe off some rust from not playing and clean some things up defensively before they enter the playoffs.

Playoff Opponent

Although Houston would like a run-up to the playoffs, the most likely scenario appears to be freezing the standings and going directly to the playoffs.

This means Houston's most likely opponent would be the 3rd seeded Denver Nuggets. The Rockets have historically done pretty well against the Nuggets, but they've drastically changed their roster make-up over the last 8 months. Swapping out Chris Paul and Clint Capela for Russell Westbrook and Robert Covington is about as significant as it gets without trading James Harden.

Capela was a matchup nightmare for the Nuggets for years, averaging 24.0 points and 11.0 rebounds on 69.6% True Shooting last season alone. The Nuggets had no good option for covering Capela's constant lob threat and the Rockets were a staggering 23.6 points per 100 possessions better when he was on the court. For Nikola Jokic, Capela was just too springy and too quick to cover while trying to properly defend James Harden. The Rockets would make life on the perimeter hell for the Nuggets as the constantly targeted Jokic for the switch and made smaller defenders try and cover Capela's lob threat when Harden drove to the rim.

Without Capela, the Rockets will not have that option open for Harden when driving to the rim. In it's ' place will be an open three-pointer that P.J. Tucker will have to hit at the same points per possession rate that Capela made his lobs. That's asking a lot, but it's the tradeoff Houston made when they made the swap.

The floor spacing that Chris Paul took with him to Oklahoma City will also be something missed for Houston in a potential first round series. The Nuggets can and will aggressively throw double teams and James Harden, often at random. Unless Russell Westbrook is constantly cutting to the rim to make them pay, it will be an effective defense that Harden has to be ready for.

I talked about this on a recent podcast episode, but I believe this series is closer to a coin toss than Rockets fans give it credit for. The historical record makes it sound laughable, but as I said, the Rockets are a different team. The margin for error they had over a team like Denver is much smaller than it was before.

If Houston can move up a seed and play the Jazz in round one, that's much preferable than this Nuggets squad. There will be no easy round one matchup in the Western Conference, but Houston's confidence against a team like the Jazz after eliminating them in the playoffs the past two years helps.

Micro-ball also sounds like an on-paper hell for a center like Rudy Gobert. He's the kind of high-impact player that has the possibility of being played off the floor against a team like the Rockets.

Eric Gordon's health

One of the only positives the Rockets can take away from this hiatus is that Eric Gordon gets time to rest his knee. Gordon has been battling soreness in his knee of late and had just returned for Houston after a two-game absence. He's now had a month without competitive basketball, which may prove to be healing for his knee. It may take a while for him to get in rhythm, but this may have helped Gordon over the long-term as the Rockets enter what they hope to be a long playoff run.

It will be interesting to see which players had access to a basketball court to get some training in over the hiatus. You would think every player have a court in their home or close by, but it's not as common as one might think.

Alright, that'll do it for this week's State of the Rockets. We changed up the format a little bit, but drastic times call for drastic measures. Next week, we'll be tackling important questions the Rockets face if the season were to be canceled.

Stay tuned and be safe.

Most Popular

SportsMap Emails
Are Awesome

Listen Live

Will the Texans respond after the Ravens debacle? Photo by Sam Hodde/Getty Images.

The Texans used to market their matchups with the Titans as the "TnT" rivalry. There is nothing explosive or even interesting about Sunday’s meeting in the regular season finale. The number of people in Houston who are ex-Oilers fans has steadily diminished over the years. Those who remain will be hard-pressed to work up any bile for this game. Most Texans fans won’t be watching. The Texans are again champions of the garbage AFC South, but a season that opened with five wins in six games has devolved to the point where the Texans may be home underdogs against whichever Wild Card round opponent shows up here next weekend. Are you fired up?!? For their part, the Titans are a Titanic-esque 3-13, with one of those wins coming 32-27 at NRG Stadium. If you’d like to attend in Nashville Sunday (why you would I have no idea), a ticket can be had for eleven bucks, including the fees larded on by the resale sites.

Some would make the argument that the Texans need to play their starters in this game to try to rediscover some mojo after the Baltimore Ravens brutalized them on Christmas Day. C.J. Stroud hasn’t had a good game in over a month, and against the Ravens was plain awful. The all too often pathetic Texans’ pass blocking has done damage to Stroud. One wonders if Nick Caserio has modified his arrogant and/or ignorant position of several weeks ago that those critical of the offensive line were using a “lazy narrative.” The losses of Nico Collins, Stefon Diggs, and Tank Dell for huge chunks of the season have hurt as well. Still, Stroud deserves blame too for the offense’s overall mediocrity. He has been noticeably less accurate this season. After Stroud’s phenomenal rookie season, only acolytes would characterize this sophomore campaign as better than disappointing. Last season Stroud was named a Pro Bowler (granted, as a replacement for Patrick Mahomes who was occupied preparing to win another Super Bowl). This season if six AFC quarterbacks were named Pro Bowlers Stroud still wouldn’t make the cut. Within the conference among quarterbacks with enough playing time to qualify in the rate statistical categories, the only guys behind Stroud in QBR: largely washed-up Aaron Rodgers, Anthony Richardson, Gardner Minshew, and Will Levis.

Would Stroud benefit from a good game against a feeble opponent? He’s taken 52 sacks this season. Why expose him to injury risk in a game where the outcome means nothing. With 53-man gameday rosters in the NFL teams can’t sit all their starters, but the most important Texans should leave their helmets and shoulder pads in Houston this weekend: Stroud, Joe Mixon, Nico Collins, Will Anderson, Danielle Hunter, and Derek Stingley Jr.. I’ll guess most play some. For instance, Mixon needs seven yards rushing for a 1000-yard season. 1000 yards over 17 games is not a big deal (59 yards per game does it), though Mixon missing three games to injury does mean he has been of the quality generally associated with 1000 yard running backs.

Danielle Hunter would like a word

On the subject of Pro Bowlers, the NFL named the squads Thursday. Thankfully there is no more hideous Pro Bowl game, but the recognition is still meaningful. Laremy Tunsil and Stingley got starting nods, with Mixon and Collins named backups. I imagine a few eyes rolled at reading Tunsil’s selection. Tunsil is a very good tackle who has mostly cleaned up his embarrassing early season false start problems. Should he be a Pro Bowler? It’s not absurd, though as one frame of reference Pro Football Focus ranks Tunsil the 18th best offensive tackle in the league heading into this weekend. Mixon’s selection is questionable but that guy runs hard and has pretty much been exactly what the Texans hoped for when they added him. This is the third consecutive season that Mixon has not fumbled. Collins missing five games makes his choice a non-no brainer (Jaguars rookie Brian Thomas had a strong case), but over the 11 games he has played Collins has been sensational. Stingley has been excellent in this his first healthy season, after missing eight games as a rookie and six last year.

The way the roster is constructed, no Texan was blatantly snubbed, though Danielle Hunter can rightfully ask "What about me?" relative to the Raiders' Maxx Crosby. Will Anderson cannot. A snub exists when a player is omitted for a clearly less deserving player. Attendance is part of the grade. Anderson has played a tick under 55 percent of the Texans’ defensive snaps. Hunter has played over 73 percent. That’s a difference of almost 200 plays. Defensive end selectees Crosby, Myles Garrett, and Trey Hendrickson are all outstanding, all have been on the field for more than 200 plays more than Anderson, and none of them benefit from having a Hunter-caliber d-line mate.

For Texans’ conversation, catch Brandon Strange, Josh Jordan, and me on our Texans On Tap podcasts. Thursdays feature a preview of the upcoming game, and then we go live (then available on demand) after the final gun of the game: Texans on Tap - YouTube

The Astros are always in season for discussion. Our Stone Cold ‘Stros podcasts drop Mondays: Click here to watch!

SportsMap Emails
Are Awesome