Changing it up

What would a two-game NFL preseason look like?

What would a two-game NFL preseason look like?
Does J.J. Watt need the time? Bob Levey/Getty Images

The concept of a two-game preseason comes up every year when injuries happen to important players and teams now have holes they weren’t worried about before. This year there are already over a dozen players just with knee injuries who may not play in 2018. It’s about normal, but everyone complains about it like it isn’t anyway. It’s a great idea for some because it’s two fewer meaningless games we have to watch. But this change would have to be collectively bargained in a few years and might only happen if the players agreed to an additional two regular season games.

That’s a hard sell all around. From the players standpoint, it’s two more games they have to play at full speed where the chances of injury are higher. For the owners, it’s two less games they collect huge revenues while paying the players very little. It also means teams will have less time in training camp to get healthy and coaches will have less time to evaluate players.

That could be a huge deal for teams like the Texans. Imagine if Deshaun Watson had to be ready for game action a week from now. Would he be less than 100 percent? Would he have to sit out a game or two while Brandon Weeden leads the offense against the Patriots and Titans? The same argument applies to J.J. Watt, Carson Wentz, and Andrew Luck; all star players who suffered major injuries last year.

If the season were to start after two preseason games, it would make them a lot more interesting too. It would mean that the starters see more playing time instead of sitting out most of the game. That’s bad news for players at the back of the roster. Less playing time is less of an opportunity to make an impression. If coaches build their roster with less game film, it might not work out for the best.

Depending on when the regular season begins some players won’t be ready to take the field. With a four-game preseason, major injuries have time to heal but also be put to the test in practice and games. But because the games don’t count there is no reason for those coming off an injury to rush themselves. They generally start with a few plays and then work their way up to a full quarter or more. Shortening the schedule will force those same players into more action sooner. That could lead to a choice between recovery or getting prepared to play, but also make the games exciting. The current four-game schedule keeps a little more space for them to get used to full speed again.

Injuries are going to happen in football. It’s not a matter of if; it’s a matter of when. Major ones that end a season take longer to recover. Cutting the schedule to two games will help some teams, but for the Texans it would hurt. Having Watt and Watson and Mercilus all coming back from injured reserve, there may not be enough time; forcing them to play the start of the season in less than ideal condition. These players are ready to return though. If they really are back to full strength, then having to play in only two games will be just what they need to work hard but not overwork early on.

Fans will probably be happy. This is a sort of neutral part of the season for them. The games don’t mean anything, but reporters write about them like they do. Fans spend money on game tickets only to see their favorite players for one series. On the other hand, preseason tickets are cheaper than regular season ones and it may be their only opportunity to make it to a game. A shorter preseason would mean that those games will have more stars on the field and fans will get a good look at them for a more affordable price.

The truth is, it’s going to be a hot-button topic until the next negotiations for a new collective bargaining agreement in 2021. I’m on the side of shortening the preseason to two games. Adjustments will have to be made to training camp and regular season practice schedules so that players can be better prepared but it’s doable. I welcome the shortened schedule and would enjoy less time watching meaningless games full of players that won’t make a roster.

But owners don’t want a two-game preseason. For them these four games are a cash cow. The players are making less money for these games. However; ticket prices, concessions, and merchandise are still the same. Cutting that revenue stream in half won’t be on any of their to-do lists. There would have to be a lot of discussion and some give and take.

We will talk about this next year and the year after that. Nothing can change right now but I’m interested in the direction it’s going. The Texans still have three games left before the start of the regular season. They will continue to evaluate the young guys and work others back from injury. This year they need the extra game while plenty of others don’t. It won’t be the same scenario next year.


 

Most Popular

SportsMap Emails
Are Awesome

Listen Live

ESPN Houston 97.5 FM
Is leadership the main problem for Houston? Composite Getty Image.

With the Astros now officially ten games under .500 for the season, manager Joe Espada is taking a lot of heat from the fanbase for the team's struggles.

While we don't agree with the sentiment, we even hear fans clamoring for the return of Dusty Baker and Martin Maldonado, thinking the Astros wouldn't be in this mess if they were still here.

Which is ridiculous. First of all, Maldonado has been awful for the White Sox, hitting .048 (even worse than Jose Abreu's .065). And for those of you that think his work with the pitching staff justifies his pathetic offense. Let me say this: Where was Maldy's game calling genius for Hunter Brown, Cristian Javier, and Framber Valdez last year? All of them regressed significantly.

And as far as Baker is concerned, we have no idea how much a difference he would make, we can only speculate. Baker would also be dealing with a pitching staff ravaged with injuries. And let's not forget, Baker was the guy that refused to move Jose Abreu down in the batting order, even though he would finish the regular season with the ninth-worst OPS in baseball.

The reality of the situation is managers can only do so much in baseball. Which leads us to something else that needs to be considered. Is Espada being handcuffed by the front office? Espada and GM Dana Brown both said recently that Jon Singleton was going to get more at-bats while they give Abreu time off to try to figure things out. Yet, there Abreu was in the lineup again in the opening game of the Cubs series.

It makes us wonder how much power does Espada truly have? The Astros have some other options at first base. Yainer Diaz may only have eight games played at the position, but how much worse could he be than Abreu defensively? Abreu already has four errors, and Diaz is obviously a way better hitter. Victor Caratini isn't considered a plus offensive player, but his .276 batting average makes him look like Babe Ruth compared to Abreu. Let him catch more often and play Diaz at first. Starting Diaz at first more often could also lengthen his career long-term.

Maybe that's too wild of a move. Okay, fine. How about playing Mauricio Dubon at first base? I understand he doesn't have much experience at that position, but what's the downside of trying him there? If he can play shortstop, he can play first base. He's driving in runs at a higher rate (11 RBIs) than everyone on the team outside of Kyle Tucker and Yordan Alvarez. And he's producing like that as part-time player right now.

The other criticism we see of Espada is his use of Jon Singleton to pinch hit late in games. Let's be real, though, who else does Espada have on the roster to go to? Batting Abreu late in games in which you're trailing should be considered malpractice. Espada can only use who he has to work with. This all really stems from the Astros poor farm system.

They don't have anyone else to turn to. The draft picks the club lost from the sign-stealing scandal are really hurting them right now. First and second rounders from 2020 and 2021 should be helping you in 2024 at the big league level.

Maybe they go to Astros prospect Joey Loperfido soon, but after a hot start he has only two hits in his last six games.

Finally, we have to talk about what seems like a committee making baseball decisions. Lost in a committee is accountability. Who gets the blame for making poor decisions?

As time continues to pass it looks like moving on from former GM James Click was a massive mistake. He's the guy that didn't sign Abreu, but did trade Myles Straw (recently DFA'd) for Yainer Diaz and Phil Maton. He also built an elite bullpen without breaking the bank, and helped the club win a World Series in 2022.

The reality of the situation is Dusty Baker and James Click are not walking back through that door. And all good runs come to an end at some point. Is this what we're witnessing?

Don't miss the video above as we hit on all the points discussed and much more!

Catch Stone Cold 'Stros (an Astros podcast) with Charlie Pallilo, Brandon Strange, and Josh Jordan. We drop two episodes every week on SportsMapHouston's YouTube channel. You can also listen on Apple Podcast, Spotifyor wherever you get your podcasts.

SportsMap Emails
Are Awesome