Another heavy rain event is headed our way. I break it down for you here.

What you need to know about our heavy rain forecast

What you need to know about our heavy rain forecast
National Weather Service Houston

So here we are, another holiday weekend (Mothers Day in case you forgot), staring yet another heavy rain event in the face. Springtime heavy rain events in this area are notoriously difficult to forecast and this week's storm is no different. So while I can't tell you exactly where and how much it will rain in any given spot I do want to take this opportunity to explain the threat in a manner that is hopefully easy to understand.

Why is this all happening?

This afternoon a front is going to drop down through the state and stall over our area. This front will serve as a focusing mechanism for storms over the next few days. It will be both a source of the lift that is needed to form storms as well as a track for atmospheric disturbances – triggering mechanisms – traversing the area. If you walked outside today you undoubtedly noticed the absurd humidity. This is a result of copious amount of moisture being pumped in off the Gulf which is nothing but storm fuel. Beginning late Thursday and continuing through Saturday evening a number of disturbances will be riding along the stalled front triggering storms like pulses of electricity running down a wire, that also happens to have a bottle of lighter fluid pointed at it.

Once storms form they may be in no hurry to move, or may keep building on themselves causing some unlucky spots to be pounded for hours. This is where the flooding issue sets in. Another compounding factor will be that at times the airflow in the upper atmosphere (part of the jet stream) will split off in different directions over the area. This will provide an additional source of lift for the storms and essentially act as an exhaust fan helping to fan the flames. This will only serve to increase the rainmaking ability of the storms.

When is this all going to happen?

The general consensus is that this event will begin late this afternoon or this evening and continue through Saturday evening. It will not rain the entire time but waves of heavy rain and storms will be possible any time during that time frame as those atmospheric disturbances make their way across the area. The best advice would be to stay alert especially if you have plans to be out during that time, especially at night.

How much is it really going to rain?

By now I am sure you have seen on the local weather reports that anywhere between 3 to 5 inches will be common with some spots getting up to 12 inches. While it is true that some spots may indeed only see a couple of inches of rain in this event it is impossible at this time to determine where the rain bulls-eyes will be. Speaking of those bulls-eyes – these type of set ups can very easily over-produce so while the "official forecast" right now calls for high spots of 12 inches I really wouldn't be shocked if a couple of places picked up 15 or maybe even 20 inches of rain before this is all said and done.

The real issue in these situations is really rainfall rates, or how much rain falls per hour. For the most part our streets and drainage systems are designed to handle about 1 to 1.5 inches per hour. However, as we saw on Tuesday these types of storms in an absolutely juiced up atmosphere can produce rainfall rates that far exceed that, sometimes pushing 4 or 5 inches per hour. It is these high rainfall rates that will produce the flooding issues that we see. As I mentioned above there will be breaks in the rain over the next few days, the problem is going to be that most of the 10 inches someone gets may all fall within a 2 or 3 hour span.

Where is the worst going to be?

Unfortunately this is simply impossible to determine right now. Before you get all cranky on meteorologists no being able to get things right let me explain why. Many of the atmospheric features that determine exactly where storms form and produce heavy rain are so small that they cannot be seen until a few hours out, if that. The computer models that are typically used to aid in creating a forecast can only project conditions down to a certain area (their resolution). The models that forecast on a global basis can "see" things down to 6-10 miles wile some higher resolution models can "see" things down to just a couple of miles. So while these models are helpful in showing us the overall set up is ripe for heavy rain they are unable to accurately pick up on boundaries or other triggering mechanisms that may below their resolution. In addition to that, once storms form they create their own environments, often sending out additional boundaries which trigger more storms nearby. This chain reaction effect is also nearly impossible to predict with accuracy. While the science of meteorology is light years ahead of where it was even 10 -15 years ago it still is not perfect.

The key here is to prepare as though you will find yourself in one of these rain bulls-eyes and hope for the best. These areas will be relatively small and probably spread out across the area but it is just impossible to tell right now which neighborhoods will be the ones to get them.

I know heavy rain events cause a lot of anxiety and stress in our post Harvey world, but I want to assure you that there is no indication that this event will be another Harvey. Yes there will likely be street flooding and maybe some structure flooding in places but this will not be a widespread catastrophic event. This type of system is part of the reality of living on the Gulf Coast in a highly urban area. Heavy rainfalls are a fact of life and the best we can do is arm ourselves with the knowledge necessary to be prepared and use our best judgment to stay safe.

P.S. If you do not already, I would highly encourage you to follow the Houston National Weather Service office on whatever social media platforms you like to use. They are an invaluable source of information and are the ones who issue any warnings that may be necessary.


Most Popular

SportsMap Emails
Are Awesome

Listen Live

ESPN Houston 97.5 FM
Kyle Tucker and Alex Bregman are hot names at the Winter Meetings. Composite Getty Image.

The woeful state of the Astros' farm system has made it very expensive to continue maintaining a good team, prohibitively so (in part self-imposed) from having a great team. Even if they re-sign Alex Bregman, trading Framber Valdez and/or Kyle Tucker for prospects could snap the Astros' run of eight straight postseason appearances. But if they KNOW that no way do they intend to offer Framber five years 130 million dollars, Tucker 7/225 or whatever their free agent markets might be after next season, keeping them for 2025 but getting nothing but 2026 compensatory draft picks for them could do multi-year damage to the franchise.

The time is here for the Astros to be aggressively shopping both. It doesn't make trading them obligatory, but even though many purported top prospects amount to little or nothing (look up what the Astros traded to Detroit for Justin Verlander, to Pittsburgh for Gerrit Cole, to Arizona for Zack Greinke) if strong packages are offered the Astros need to act if unwilling (reasonably or not) to pay Valdez/Tucker.

Last offseason the Milwaukee Brewers traded pitching ace Corbin Burnes one season ahead of his free agency and then again won the National League Central, the San Diego Padres dealt Juan Soto and wound up much improved and a playoff team after missing the 2023 postseason. But nailing the trades is critical. The Brewers got their everyday rookie third baseman Joey Ortiz and two other prospects. The Padres got quality starter Michael King, catcher Kyle Hagashioka, and three prospects.

Back to Bregman

Meanwhile, decision time approaches for Alex Bregman. He, via agent Scott Boras, wants 200-plus million dollars. Don't we all. If he can land that from somebody, congratulations. The Astros' six-year 156 million dollar contract offer is more than fair. That's 26 million dollars per season and would take Bregman within a few months of his 37th birthday. If rounding up to 160 mil gets it done, ok I guess. Going to 200 would be silly.

While Bregman hasn't been a superstar (or even an All-Star) since 2019, he's still a very good player. That includes his 2024 season which showed decline offensively. Not falling off a cliff decline other than his walk rate plunging about 45 percent, but decline. If Bregman remains the exact player he was this season, six-156 is pricey but not crazy in the current marketplace. But how likely is Bregman to not drop off further in his mid-30s? As noted before, the storyline is bogus that Bregman has been a postseason monster. Over seven League Championship Series and four World Series Bregman has a .196 batting average.
The Astros already should be sweating some over Jose Altuve having shown marked decline this season, before his five year 125 million dollar extension covering 2025-2029 even starts. Altuve was still very good offensively though well down from 2022 and 2023 (defensively his data are now awful), but as he approaches turning 35 years old in May some concern is warranted when locked into paying a guy until he's nearly 39 1/2.

Jim Crane is right in noting that long contracts paying guys huge money in their later years generally go poorly for the clubs.

Bang for your buck

Cleveland third baseman Jose Ramirez is heading into the second year of a five-year, $124 million extension. That's 24.8 million dollars per season. Jose Ramirez is a clearly better player than Alex Bregman. Ramirez has been the better player for five consecutive seasons, and only in 2023 was it even close. It should be noted that Ramirez signed his extension in April of 2022. He is about a year and a half older than Bregman so the Guardians are paying their superstar through his age 36 season.

Bregman benefits from playing his home games at soon-to be named Daikin Park. Bregman hit 26 home runs this year. Using ball-tracking data, if he had played all his games in Houston, Bregman would have hit 31 homers. Had all his swings been taken at Yankee Stadium, the "Breggy Bomb" count would have been 25. In Cleveland, just 18. Ramirez hit 41 dingers. If all his games were home games 40 would have cleared the fences, if all had been at Minute Maid Park 47 would have been gone.

Matt Chapman recently signed a six-year 151 million dollar deal to stay with the San Francisco Giants. That's 25.166 million per season. Chapman was clearly a better player than Bregman this year. But it's the only season of Chapman's career that is the case. Chapman is 11 months older than Bregman, so his lush deal with the Giants carries through his age 37 season.

The Giants having overpaid Chapman doesn't obligate the Astros to do the same with Bregman. So, if you're the Astros do you accept overpaying Bregman? They would almost certainly be worse without him in 2025, but what about beyond? Again, having not one elite prospect in their minor league system boxes them in. Still, until/unless the Seattle Mariners upgrade their offense, the Astros cling to American League West favorites status. On the other hand, WITH Bregman, Tucker, and Valdez the Astros are no postseason lock.

For Texans’ conversation, catch Brandon Strange, Josh Jordan, and me on our Texans On Tap podcasts. Thursdays feature a preview of the upcoming game, and then we go live (then available on demand) after the final gun of the game: Texans on Tap - YouTube

The Astros are always in season for discussion. Our Stone Cold ‘Stros podcasts drop Mondays: Click here to watch!

SportsMap Emails
Are Awesome